Web 2.0- a driver? or an enabler?

Downes summarises the parallel development of E-learning and Web 2.0. Although the technology seems to be the driver, could I suggest that it is the enabler. People and social connectivity have formed communities of practice. Alternatively, both drivers were needed to create this newest revolution in learning.

Which do you think is the most important- the technology or the social groups?

Technology is now able to do what people always did, connect and communicate, but more efficiently and globally. Information is now micro-formatted allowing people to share, remix and network. Downes calls this a social revolution. I don't think the revolution is driven by technology but inevitable as a response to world history. It is the natural response, started in the 1970's, to fascism, industrialism and political systems. Liberty was the important value in the post-war period. The social/socialist revolution questions authority; values a diversity of opinion and sees power in grass roots movements. The feminist revolution, anti-Vietnam lobby, green lobby for environmentalism and Indigenous rights are some of the results of the social networking revolution.

People are driving changes to work an learning because they can easily maintain CoPs from home. As Prime Minister Rudd implied in his electioneering, the Information Superhighway is the important communication tool, just as building highways and rail systems were at the turn of the century. This is reflected in Green philosophy, Think Global- Act Local.

Reference:

Downes, S (nd) E-Learning-2.0, E-Learning Magazine Education and Learning in Perspective Retrieved 23/11/2007 from http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articles&article=29-1